R-302: the abandon banner promises only what the box can still see is true
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s

The retrieval clause rendered unconditionally on every page and is false on a
reachable state - the same screen where the orphan card says we cannot tell.

The condition is a fingerprint PINNED at the decision, not a comparison against
the current key. The obvious proxy asks about the wrong key: the set-aside
copies were written under an older key the box no longer has, so on a
twice-rebuilt box the proxy promises about copies nothing can open. Demonstrated
- under the proxy, the replaced-package and legacy cases both flip back to
promising.

The pin is a recorded assumption and says so: nothing on the box records which
key wrote those copies. Empty is not a match. A countdown started before this
carries no pin and takes the cautious branch, not a backfill.

A sweep of all 36 templates found a fourth instance (backups page, same
condition applied) and a fifth (the confirmation screen, correctly left alone -
true at the moment of the decision).

New retrieval_promise_gate registers each claim with a reason rather than
banning a verb: a string ban failed twice, and the honest replacement copy
contains the stem.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-12 15:27:29 +02:00
parent 1b66010298
commit 89712563a0
11 changed files with 554 additions and 3 deletions
+1
View File
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ GATES = [
("mojibake", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "mojibake_gate.py"), [], True),
("docker-v", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "docker_run_volume_path_gate.py"), [], True),
("secret-markup", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "secret_in_markup_gate.py"), [], True),
("retrieval-promise", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "retrieval_promise_gate.py"), [], True),
("reuse-refs", SHARED_REUSE, [REPO], True),
("instructions", SHARED_INSTRUCTIONS, [REPO], True),
]