R-1251: sync the restore copy's folders before the marker names it (a cut left undo.json as .tmp on Tester 1); the interrupted-restore record says the put-back waits, not 'run it again'. Commit only.
gates / gates (push) Successful in 1m24s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 1m24s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -42,6 +42,16 @@ brief 2026-10-24, Part 4 (commit only; the release rides the next normal train).
|
||||
holds the same way.
|
||||
- **Stop pressed during a restore no longer skips the put-back after a cut (H7):** the data is put back; the app stays
|
||||
stopped as the household asked.
|
||||
- **The copy is on disk before the marker names it** (found by the live proof on Tester 1, 2026-10-24: a power cut
|
||||
2.1 s after „the restore copy is recorded" left the 1.5 GB tar whole but the journal as `undo.json.tmp` — the rename
|
||||
lived only in the page cache, the marker on the other filesystem was durable, and the start could not read the
|
||||
copy; the new H2 hold kept the app stopped). `persistUndoForCrash` now syncs the copy's folders up to `backups/`
|
||||
(`syncUndoDirs`) before `SetUndo`, and `atomicWriteFile` syncs the folder after its rename. Pinned by
|
||||
`TestR1251_TheCopyIsOnDiskBeforeTheMarkerNamesIt` (seen failing with the sync removed).
|
||||
- **The household is no longer told to run the restore again while its put-back waits** — that would restore the backup
|
||||
over the data the box is about to put back. The restore record (`PutBackWaiting`,
|
||||
`note.restore.interrupted_put_back_waiting`) and the `restore_interrupted` event say the box puts the data back when
|
||||
the drive is there. Pinned by `TestR1251_TheRecordSaysThePutBackWaits` (seen failing).
|
||||
- A removal clears a waiting put-back (it belongs to the install); a later restore that completes drops it (the
|
||||
household chose that data; the copy stays on disk).
|
||||
- Tests (each seen failing with its rule taken out): `TestR1251_DriveCutRestoreWaitsForTheDriveThenPutsBackBeforeAnyStart`
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user