v0.130.0 released: tag + package published, heading now claims it
gates / gates (push) Successful in 8s

sha256 a56a92a7bd68f5b46736eaec4806c3d26c16ccb35118c4ac0e3d8094eaefabc3
tag v0.130.0 at 7569f34, 14,141,158 bytes.

Reproducible: rebuilding with -trimpath -buildvcs=false matches the
published artifact byte for byte (R-186's property, checked not assumed).

The heading said UNRELEASED while the fix was hand-installed on demo-hp
only -- publishing then would have pushed it onto the control box through
self-update. release-complete convicted on the release heading and was
right to; the answer was to stop claiming a release, not to bypass it.

NOT VOUCHED by this commit. Vouching is the separate operator act.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-20 12:47:25 +02:00
parent 7569f34aeb
commit 7ae6990bac
+11 -7
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,15 @@
## UNRELEASED — v0.130.0 candidate: the agent was the one leaking connections onto the off-site box (2026-08-20, R-344)
## v0.130.0 — the agent was the one leaking connections onto the off-site box (2026-08-20, R-344)
> **Deliberately not a release heading yet, and the `release-complete` gate is doing its job by
> requiring that.** This build is **hand-installed on `demo-hp` only** so the fix can be proved
> against `demo-felhom` as an untouched control. Publishing it — tag + Gitea package — would put it
> on the control box through the self-update path and destroy the experiment. **When the operator
> authorises the publish, this heading becomes `## v0.130.0` in the same commit as the tag and the
> package**, and the gate then checks it for real. See R-347.
> **RELEASED 2026-08-20**, on the operator's word, after the fix was proved on both boxes.
> `sha256 a56a92a7bd68f5b46736eaec4806c3d26c16ccb35118c4ac0e3d8094eaefabc3`, 14,141,158 bytes,
> tag `v0.130.0` at `7569f34`. Reproducible: a rebuild with `-trimpath -buildvcs=false` matches the
> published artifact byte for byte (R-186's property, checked rather than assumed).
>
> The heading read `## UNRELEASED — v0.130.0 candidate` until this point, deliberately: while the fix
> was hand-installed on `demo-hp` only, publishing would have pushed it onto `demo-felhom` through
> self-update and destroyed the control the proof rested on. **`release-complete` convicted on the
> release heading and was right to** — the answer was to stop claiming a release, not to bypass the
> gate. See R-347.
**What was measured, before anything was changed.** Between 2026-08-18 09:51:22Z and 2026-08-20
08:02:13Z, ep0's PBS proxy accumulated **388 established connections** — 194 from each demo box, on a